On 1/30/23, David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
From: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev
Looks like kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was messed up in a merge conflict. This fixes it.
kunit_test_init_section_suites(...) was not updated to avoid the extra level of indirection when .kunit_test_suites was flattened. Given no-one was actively using it, this went unnoticed for a long period of time.
Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites") Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
include/kunit/test.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 87ea90576b50..716deaeef3dd 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -303,7 +303,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) */ #define kunit_test_init_section_suites(__suites...) \ __kunit_test_suites(CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(array), _probe), \
CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(suites), _probe), \ ##__suites)#define kunit_test_init_section_suite(suite) \
2.39.1.456.gfc5497dd1b-goog
Tested-by: Martin Fernandez martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com
Thanks!