On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mike Kravetz mike.kravetz@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/4/19 1:04 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:23 PM Mike Kravetz mike.kravetz@oracle.com wrote:
On 10/29/19 6:36 PM, Mina Almasry wrote:
static long add_reservation_in_range(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t,
bool count_only)
long *regions_needed, bool count_only)
{
long chg = 0;
long add = 0; struct list_head *head = &resv->regions;
long last_accounted_offset = f; struct file_region *rg = NULL, *trg = NULL, *nrg = NULL;
/* Locate the region we are before or in. */
list_for_each_entry (rg, head, link)
if (f <= rg->to)
break;
if (regions_needed)
*regions_needed = 0;
/* Round our left edge to the current segment if it encloses us. */
if (f > rg->from)
f = rg->from;
chg = t - f;
/* In this loop, we essentially handle an entry for the range
* [last_accounted_offset, rg->from), at every iteration, with some
* bounds checking.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(rg, trg, head, link) {
/* Skip irrelevant regions that start before our range. */
if (rg->from < f) {
/* If this region ends after the last accounted offset,
* then we need to update last_accounted_offset.
*/
if (rg->to > last_accounted_offset)
last_accounted_offset = rg->to;
continue;
}
/* Check for and consume any regions we now overlap with. */
nrg = rg;
list_for_each_entry_safe (rg, trg, rg->link.prev, link) {
if (&rg->link == head)
break;
/* When we find a region that starts beyond our range, we've
* finished.
*/ if (rg->from > t) break;
/* We overlap with this area, if it extends further than
* us then we must extend ourselves. Account for its
* existing reservation.
/* Add an entry for last_accounted_offset -> rg->from, and
* update last_accounted_offset. */
if (rg->to > t) {
chg += rg->to - t;
t = rg->to;
if (rg->from > last_accounted_offset) {
add += rg->from - last_accounted_offset;
if (!count_only) {
nrg = get_file_region_entry_from_cache(
resv, last_accounted_offset, rg->from);
list_add(&nrg->link, rg->link.prev);
} else if (regions_needed)
*regions_needed += 1; }
chg -= rg->to - rg->from;
if (!count_only && rg != nrg) {
list_del(&rg->link);
kfree(rg);
}
last_accounted_offset = rg->to;
That last assignment is unneeded. Correct?
Not to make you nervous, but this assignment is needed.
The basic idea is that there are 2 loop invariants here:
- Everything before last_accounted_offset is filled in with file_regions.
- rg points to the first region past last_account_offset.
Each loop iteration compares rg->from to last_accounted_offset, and if there is a gap, it creates a new region to fill this gap. Then this assignment restores loop invariant #2 by assigning last_accounted_offset to rg->to, since now everything before rg->to is filled in with file_regions.
My apologies!
}
if (!count_only) {
nrg->from = f;
nrg->to = t;
/* Handle the case where our range extends beyond
* last_accounted_offset.
*/
if (last_accounted_offset < t) {
add += t - last_accounted_offset;
if (!count_only) {
nrg = get_file_region_entry_from_cache(
resv, last_accounted_offset, t);
list_add(&nrg->link, rg->link.prev);
} else if (regions_needed)
*regions_needed += 1;
last_accounted_offset = t;
The question about an unnecessary assignment was supposed to be directed at the above line.
Oh, yes. That assignment is completely unnecessary; the function just exits after pretty much. Will remove, thanks!
-- Mike Kravetz
}
return chg;
return add;
}