Hi, Andrii!
On Tue, 26 May 2020 15:32:10 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:41 PM Yauheni Kaliuta yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com wrote:
Actually, a bit more needed :)
From the other kselftest thread, it seems like selftests are not supporting builds out-of-tree. With that, wouldn't it be simpler to build in tree and then just copy selftests/bpf directory to wherever you need to run tests from? It would be simple and reliable. Given I and probably everyone else never build and run tests out-of-tree, it's just too easy to break this and you'll be constantly chasing some non-obvious breakages...
Is there some problem with such approach?
This is `make install` ;).
I personally do not need OOT build, but since it's in the code, I'd prefer either fix it or remove it, otherwise it's misleading. But I have not got reply from kselftest.
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 07:13:02 +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
I had a look, here are some fixes. Yauheni Kaliuta (8): selftests/bpf: remove test_align from Makefile selftests/bpf: build bench.o for any $(OUTPUT) selftests/bpf: install btf .c files selftests/bpf: fix object files installation selftests/bpf: add output dir to include list selftests/bpf: fix urandom_read installation selftests/bpf: fix test.h placing for out of tree build selftests/bpf: factor out MKDIR rule
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
-- 2.26.2
-- WBR, Yauheni Kaliuta