On 6/18/24 08:01, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
Hi Shaoqin,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:27 AM Shaoqin Huang shahuang@redhat.com wrote:
Add the invalid filter test which sets the filter beyond the event space and sets the invalid action to double check if the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER will return the expected error.
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger eric.auger@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang shahuang@redhat.com
.../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c index fb0fde1ed436..13b2f354c39b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
- This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
- sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
- can't use those events which user deny.
*/
- It also checks that setting invalid filter ranges return the expected error.
- This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
- is supported on the host.
@@ -178,6 +179,40 @@ static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void) kvm_vm_free(vpmu_vm.vm); }
+static void test_invalid_filter(void) +{
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter invalid;
int ret;
pr_info("Test: test_invalid_filter\n");
memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
vpmu_vm.vm = vm_create(1);
vpmu_vm.vcpu = vm_vcpu_add_with_vpmu(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, guest_code);
vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64);
__TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0,
"Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
/* The max event number is (1 << 16), set a range largeer than it. */
nit: s/largeer/larger
Also, perhaps not in this series, but we can also check for -EBUSY situations such as setting a (valid) filter after KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT and after the vCPUs have started.
That's also a great test, we can add it in the future.
Besides that, Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta rananta@google.com
Thanks a lot for your reviewing.
- Raghavendra
invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(BIT(15), BIT(15) + 1, 0);
ret = __kvm_device_attr_set(vpmu_vm.vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER, &invalid);
TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter range "
"ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
ret, errno);
/* Set the Invalid action. */
invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(0, 1, 3);
ret = __kvm_device_attr_set(vpmu_vm.vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER, &invalid);
TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter action "
"ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
ret, errno);
destroy_vpmu_vm();
+}
- static void run_test(struct test_desc *t) { pr_info("Test: %s\n", t->name);
@@ -300,4 +335,6 @@ int main(void) TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_pmu_support_events());
run_tests();
}test_invalid_filter();
-- 2.40.1