From: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com
Output parameters are used to refactor the LSM hook return values. To make these hooks usable by bpf prog, it is necessary for bpf prog to read and write these output return value parameters.
All return value parameters are added as the last parameter and are always pointers to integer types. This patch uses BTF ID list to specify which LMS hooks have return value parameters and enables bpf prog to read/write the last parameters of these hooks in the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com --- include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 6 ++++++ kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/btf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h index 1de7ece5d36d..73e1f6dbec4a 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ void bpf_inode_storage_free(struct inode *inode);
void bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_func_t *bpf_func);
+bool bpf_lsm_has_retval_param(const struct bpf_prog *prog); + #else /* !CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
static inline bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id) @@ -78,6 +80,10 @@ static inline void bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, { }
+static inline bool bpf_lsm_has_retval_param(const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + return false; +} #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
#endif /* _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c index e5feb6560fe6..a8f8358c77e3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c @@ -405,3 +405,18 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops lsm_verifier_ops = { .get_func_proto = bpf_lsm_func_proto, .is_valid_access = btf_ctx_access, }; + +BTF_SET_START(retval_param_lsm_hooks) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_need_killpriv) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_getsecurity) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_inode_listsecurity) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_getselfattr) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_key_getsecurity) +BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_audit_rule_match) +BTF_SET_END(retval_param_lsm_hooks) + +bool bpf_lsm_has_retval_param(const struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + return btf_id_set_contains(&retval_param_lsm_hooks, + prog->aux->attach_btf_id); +} diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index 4ff11779699e..df299d600b10 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -6499,8 +6499,22 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type, */ return true;
- if (is_int_ptr(btf, t)) + + if (is_int_ptr(btf, t)) { + /* the retval param for LSM hook is always the last param. */ + if (arg == nr_args - 1 && + prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_MAC && + bpf_lsm_has_retval_param(prog)) { + u32 id; + + btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, &id); + info->btf = btf; + /* the retval param should never be NULL */ + info->reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED; + info->btf_id = id; + } return true; + }
/* this is a pointer to another type */ for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size; i++) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index c0263fb5ca4b..a0bbef2d14e4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -6527,7 +6527,38 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; }
- if (env->ops->btf_struct_access && !type_is_alloc(reg->type) && atype == BPF_WRITE) { + if (btf_type_is_int(t)) { + u32 tsize; + const char *tname; + const struct btf_type *err; + const char *access = atype == BPF_READ ? "read" : "write"; + + /* only BPF LSM is allowed */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(env->prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_LSM_MAC)) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: not BPF LSM\n"); + return -EACCES; + } + + tname = btf_name_by_offset(reg->btf, t->name_off); + if (off != 0) { + verbose(env, "invalid %s offset: %d (expected 0, type=%s)\n", + access, off, tname); + return -EACCES; + } + + err = btf_resolve_size(reg->btf, t, &tsize); + if (IS_ERR(err)) { + verbose(env, "unable to resolve the size of type '%s': %ld\n", + tname, PTR_ERR(err)); + return PTR_ERR(err); + } + if (size != tsize) { + verbose(env, "invalid %s size: %d (expected %u, type=%s)\n", + access, size, tsize, tname); + return -EACCES; + } + ret = SCALAR_VALUE; + } else if (env->ops->btf_struct_access && !type_is_alloc(reg->type) && atype == BPF_WRITE) { if (!btf_is_kernel(reg->btf)) { verbose(env, "verifier internal error: reg->btf must be kernel btf\n"); return -EFAULT;