On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:44 PM Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:50:36PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com wrote:
From: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
Split the arch-neutral test code out of aarch64/get-reg-list.c into get-reg-list.c. To do this we invent a new make variable $(SPLIT_TESTS) which expects common parts to be in the KVM selftests root and the counterparts to have the same name, but be in $(ARCH_DIR).
There's still some work to be done to de-aarch64 the common get-reg-list.c, but we leave that to the next patch to avoid modifying too much code while moving it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 12 +- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 367 +---------------- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 377 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 358 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index c692cc86e7da..95f180e711d5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_x86_64 += x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/aarch32_id_regs TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/arch_timer TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/debug-exceptions -TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/get-reg-list TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/hypercalls TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/page_fault_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += aarch64/psci_test @@ -152,6 +151,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += access_tracking_perf_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_perf_test +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += get-reg-list TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_page_table_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += memslot_modification_stress_test @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_page_table_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += set_memory_region_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_binary_stats_test
+SPLIT_TESTS += get-reg-list
TEST_PROGS += $(TEST_PROGS_$(ARCH_DIR)) TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(ARCH_DIR)) TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_$(ARCH_DIR)) @@ -228,11 +230,14 @@ LIBKVM_C_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_C)) LIBKVM_S_OBJ := $(patsubst %.S, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_S)) LIBKVM_STRING_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_STRING)) LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_STRING_OBJ) +SPLIT_TESTS_TARGETS := $(patsubst %, $(OUTPUT)/%, $(SPLIT_TESTS)) +SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS := $(patsubst %, $(ARCH_DIR)/%.o, $(SPLIT_TESTS))
TEST_GEN_OBJ = $(patsubst %, %.o, $(TEST_GEN_PROGS)) TEST_GEN_OBJ += $(patsubst %, %.o, $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED)) TEST_DEP_FILES = $(patsubst %.o, %.d, $(TEST_GEN_OBJ)) TEST_DEP_FILES += $(patsubst %.o, %.d, $(LIBKVM_OBJS)) +TEST_DEP_FILES += $(patsubst %.o, %.d, $(SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS)) -include $(TEST_DEP_FILES)
$(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED): %: %.o @@ -240,7 +245,10 @@ $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED): %: %.o $(TEST_GEN_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) -c $< -o $@
-EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) $(TEST_DEP_FILES) $(TEST_GEN_OBJ) cscope.* +$(SPLIT_TESTS_TARGETS): %: %.o $(SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS)
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) $^ $(LDLIBS) -o $@+EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) $(TEST_DEP_FILES) $(TEST_GEN_OBJ) $(SPLIT_TESTS_OBJS) cscope.*
x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)))) $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
Hi @Andrew Jones,
After rebasing to v6.5-rc3, some changes are needed to the SPLIT_TESTS target, or the make would fail. Please help have a look.
I took a look and then remembered why I hate looking at Makefiles... I guess it's fine, but it's a pity we need to repeat the $(CC) line.
Yes, I can't figure out a way to avoid the repeat $(CC) line. Let's see whether there is any suggestion from the community that can optimize this.
Thanks, drew