On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:17PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's __printf attribute.
Fixes: 276010551664 ("time: Improve performance of time64_to_tm()") Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
kernel/time/time_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/time_test.c b/kernel/time/time_test.c index ca058c8af6ba..3e5d422dd15c 100644 --- a/kernel/time/time_test.c +++ b/kernel/time/time_test.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test) days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
#define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ year, month, mdday, yday, daysKUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG); -- 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog