On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, Dev Jain wrote:
On 6/12/24 16:14, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c index 4f5881d4ef66d..695c45635d257 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c @@ -144,10 +144,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) free((void *)hv_cpuid_entries); if (!kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX) ||
!kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS)) {
print_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported");
goto do_sys;
- }
!kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS))
ksft_exit_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported\n");
Isn't it incorrect to delete 'goto do_sys'? ksft_exit_skip() will exit and the program will never jump to that label. At other places too you have deleted the 'goto'.
Ya, exiting instead of continuing on will break these tests.