Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:19PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
KUNIT_FAIL() accepts a printf-style format string, but previously did not let gcc validate it with the __printf() attribute. The use of %lld for the result of PTR_ERR() is not correct.
Instead, use %pe and pass the actual error pointer. printk() will format it correctly (and give a symbolic name rather than a number if available, which should make the output more readable, too).
Fixes: b3098d32ed6e ("net: add skb_segment kunit test") Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Looks good.
For those wondering, %pe has a special meaning in the kernel which can be seen in lib/vsprintf.c.
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt justinstitt@google.com
net/core/gso_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/gso_test.c b/net/core/gso_test.c index 4c2e77bd12f4..358c44680d91 100644 --- a/net/core/gso_test.c +++ b/net/core/gso_test.c @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void gso_test_func(struct kunit *test)
segs = skb_segment(skb, features); if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "segs error %lld", PTR_ERR(segs));
goto free_gso_skb; } else if (!segs) { KUNIT_FAIL(test, "no segments");KUNIT_FAIL(test, "segs error %pe", segs);
-- 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
Thanks Justin