On 8/30/19 8:09 AM, shuah wrote:
On 8/22/19 3:58 PM, Alakesh Haloi wrote:
Without this patch we see following error while building and kselftest for secccomp_bpf fails.
seccomp_bpf.c:1787:20: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this function); seccomp_bpf.c:1788:6: error: ‘PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT’ undeclared (first use in this function);
Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi alakesh.haloi@gmail.com
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 6ef7f16c4cf5..2e619760fc3e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1353,6 +1353,14 @@ TEST_F(precedence, log_is_fifth_in_any_order) #define PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP 7 #endif +#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 1 +#endif
+#ifndef PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 2 +#endif
#define IS_SECCOMP_EVENT(status) ((status >> 16) == PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP) bool tracer_running; void tracer_stop(int sig)
Hi Kees,
Okay to apply this one for 5.4-rc1. Or is this going through bpf tree? If it is going through bpf tree:
Acked-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
I saw your mail about Tycho's solution to be your preferred. Ignore this message. I am applying Tycho's patch.
thanks, -- Shuah