On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:51:13AM +0800, Meng Li wrote:
ACPI 6.5 section 8.4.6.1.1.1 specifies that Notify event 0x85 can be emmitted to cause the the OSPM to re-evaluate the highest performance register. Add support for this event.
Signed-off-by: Meng Li li.meng@amd.com Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/08_Processor_Configuration_and_Control.html?...
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++++ include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c index 4bd16b3f0781..29b2fb68a35d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE 0x80 #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_POWER 0x81 #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_THROTTLING 0x82 +#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_HIGEST_PERF_CHANGED 0x85 MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Diefenbaugh"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Processor Driver"); @@ -83,6 +84,11 @@ static void acpi_processor_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data) acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(device->pnp.device_class, dev_name(&device->dev), event, 0); break;
- case ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_HIGEST_PERF_CHANGED:
cpufreq_update_highest_perf(pr->id);acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(device->pnp.device_class,dev_name(&device->dev), event, 0);break;
I've obviously not read the link, but the above seems to suggest that every CPU that has its limits changed gets the 'interrupt' ?