Re: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: Accept any valid fd in user_notification_addfd

On 2/9/21 5:33 PM, Kees Cook wrote:

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:17:21AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:

...

This test expects fds to have specific values, which works fine when the test is run standalone. However, the kselftest runner consumes a couple of extra fds for redirection when running tests, so the test fails when run via kselftest.

Change the test to pass on any valid fd number.

Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee seth.forshee@canonical.com

Thanks!

Acked-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org

I'll snag this if Shuah doesn't first. :)

I will apply this. I have several queued for 5.12-rc1 anyway.

thanks, -- Shuah