On 18.08.22 01:41, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 07:55:38PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 7/21/22 11:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Also, I*think* you can place pages via userfaultfd into shmem. Not sure if that would count "auto alloc", but it would certainly bypass fallocate().
Yeah, userfaultfd_register would probably have to forbid this for F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE vmas. Maybe the memfile_node can be reused for this, adding a new MEMFILE_F_NO_AUTO_ALLOCATE flags? Then userfault_register would do something like memfile_node_get_flags(vma->vm_file) and check the result.
I donno, memory allocation with userfaultfd looks pretty intentional to me. Why would F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE prevent it?
Can't we say the same about a write()?
Maybe we would need it in the future for post-copy migration or something?
Or existing practises around userfaultfd touch memory randomly and therefore incompatible with F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE intent?
Note, that userfaultfd is only relevant for shared memory as it requires VMA which we don't have for MFD_INACCESSIBLE.
This feature (F_SEAL_AUTO_ALLOCATE) is independent of all the lovely encrypted VM stuff, so it doesn't matter how it relates to MFD_INACCESSIBLE.