On 12/20/20 10:18 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:27 AM Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:16 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Because if you get a report of something breaking for your change, you need to work to resolve it, not argue about it. Otherwise it needs to be dropped/reverted.
Nobody has argued that. In fact, I explicitly said the opposite: "So I think we can fix them as they come.".
I am expecting Masahiro to follow up. It has been less than 24 hours since the report, on a weekend.
Cheers, Miguel
Sorry for the delay.
Now I sent out the fix for lantiq_etop.c
next-20201218, alpha:allmodconfig:
fs/binfmt_em86.c: In function 'load_em86': fs/binfmt_em86.c:66:2: error: ignoring return value of 'remove_arg_zero' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result'
With a change like this, I'd have expected that there is a coccinelle script or similar to ensure that claims made in the commit message are true.
Guenter