On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
On 2025-08-17 11:39:05+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 10:30:52AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
On 2025-07-21 04:56:27+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 05:38:28PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
(...)
I think I'd be fine with this, but then we need to make it explicit in the help message and fix the current one, possibly just with this:
- @echo " nolibc-test build the executable (uses $$CC and $$CROSS_COMPILE)"
- @echo " nolibc-test build the executable (uses $$CC)"
I don't think this is correct. $CC itself depends on $CROSS_COMPILE through tools/scripts/Makefile.include.
I don't understand what you mean by "depends on" here. CC defaults to ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc and may override it if set. So if one sets CC, CROSS_COMPILE will not be used for it. Or maybe we could change it to this to indicate a precedence if that's the idea you want to convey ?
- @echo " nolibc-test build the executable (uses $$CC and $$CROSS_COMPILE)"
- @echo " nolibc-test build the executable (uses $$CC or $$CROSS_COMPILE)"
Yes, that is the idea. I pushed a commit to this effect to nolibc/for-next.
OK perfect, thank you! Willy