31 May
2023
31 May
'23
4:12 a.m.
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 10:10:15AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
I agree with you that the existing IOPF framework is not ideal for IOMMUFD. The adding ASYNC flag conflicts with the IOPF workqueue. This could lead to performance issues.
I can improve the IOPF framework to make it more friendly to IOMMUFD. One way to do this would be not use workqueue for the IOMMUFD case.
Have I covered all your concerns?
Yea. My concern was mainly at the fault report for non-PRI cases. Though I am still on the fence about using IOPF framework, let's see first how the improved design would look like.
Thanks Nic