On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n; for_each_reg_filtered(i) \ if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i])) +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
- for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) return; }
- for_each_sublist(c, s)
blessed_n += s->regs_n;
- blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
- n = 0;
- for_each_sublist(c, s) {
for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
- }
- /*
- We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
- same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
@@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test * executable.
*
* Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
*/* since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
- for_each_reg(i) {
- for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) { uint8_t addr[2048 / 8]; struct kvm_one_reg reg = { .id = reg_list->reg[i],
@@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } }
- for_each_sublist(c, s)
blessed_n += s->regs_n;
- blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
- n = 0;
- for_each_sublist(c, s) {
for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
- }
- for_each_new_reg(i) ++new_regs;
2.34.1
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
Thanks, drew