Currently, in order to compare arrays in KUnit, the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ or KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE macros are used in conjunction with the memcmp function, such as: KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0);
Although this usage produces correct results for the test cases, if the expectation fails the error message is not very helpful, indicating only the return of the memcmp function.
Therefore, create a new set of macros KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_ARRNEQ that compare memory blocks until a determined size. In case of expectation failure, those macros print the hex dump of the memory blocks, making it easier to debug test failures for arrays.
For example, if I am using the KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ macro and apply the following diff (introducing a test failure) to the drm/tests/drm_format_helper.c:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c index 3106abb3bead..942aa131a768 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static struct convert_xrgb8888_case convert_xrgb8888_cases[] = { .rgb565_result = { .dst_pitch = 10, .expected = { - 0x0A33, 0x1260, 0xA800, 0x0000, 0x0000, - 0x6B8E, 0x0A33, 0x1260, 0x0000, 0x0000, - 0xA800, 0x6B8E, 0x0A33, 0x0000, 0x0000, + 0x0A31, 0x1260, 0xA800, 0x0000, 0x0000, + 0x6B81, 0x0A33, 0x1260, 0x0000, 0x0000, + 0xA801, 0x6B8E, 0x0A33, 0x0000, 0x0000, }, .expected_swab = { 0x330A, 0x6012, 0x00A8, 0x0000, 0x0000,}}}
I will get a test failure with the following form:
➜ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y \ 'drm_format_helper_test' [...] [12:38:20] ================= xrgb8888_to_rgb565_test ================== [12:38:20] [PASSED] single_pixel_source_buffer [12:38:20] [PASSED] single_pixel_clip_rectangle [12:38:20] [PASSED] well_known_colors [12:38:20] # xrgb8888_to_rgb565_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c:248 [12:38:20] Expected dst == result->expected, but [12:38:20] dst == [12:38:20] 00000000: 33 0a 60 12 00 a8 00 00 00 00 8e 6b 33 0a 60 12 [12:38:20] 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 a8 8e 6b 33 0a 00 00 00 00 [12:38:20] result->expected == [12:38:20] 00000000: 31 0a 60 12 00 a8 00 00 00 00 81 6b 33 0a 60 12 [12:38:20] 00000010: 00 00 00 00 01 a8 8e 6b 33 0a 00 00 00 00 [12:38:20] not ok 4 - destination_pitch [12:38:20] [FAILED] destination_pitch [12:38:20] # Subtest: xrgb8888_to_rgb565_test [12:38:20] # xrgb8888_to_rgb565_test: pass:3 fail:1 skip:0 total:4 [12:38:20] not ok 2 - xrgb8888_to_rgb565_test [...] [12:38:20] ============= [FAILED] drm_format_helper_test ============== [12:38:20] ============================================================ [12:38:20] Testing complete. Ran 8 tests: passed: 7, failed: 1 [12:38:20] Elapsed time: 3.713s total, 0.002s configuring, 3.546s building, 0.135s running
Noticed that, with the hex dump, it is possible to check which bytes are making the test fail. So, it is easier to debug the cause of the failure.
The first patch of the series introduces the KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_ARRNEQ. The second patch adds an example of array expectations on the kunit-example-test.c. And the last patch replaces the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ for KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ on the existing occurrences.
Best Regards, - Maíra Canal
Maíra Canal (3): kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_ARRNEQ macros kunit: add KUnit array assertions to the example_all_expect_macros_test kunit: use KUNIT_EXPECT_ARREQ macro
.../gpu/drm/tests/drm_format_helper_test.c | 6 +- include/kunit/assert.h | 35 +++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 76 +++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/assert.c | 43 +++++++++++ lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 7 ++ net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 4 +- 6 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)