Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu writes:
Le 05/08/2024 à 10:30, Madhavan Srinivasan a écrit :
Currently exec-target.c file is linked as static and this post a requirement to install libc dev package to build. Without it, build-breaks when compiling selftest/powerpc/benchmark.
CC exec_target /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc: No such file or directory collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
exec_target.c is using "syscall" library function which could be replaced with a inline assembly and the same is proposed as a fix here.
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan maddy@linux.ibm.com
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/Makefile | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/exec_target.c | 10 ++++++++-- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/exec_target.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/exec_target.c index c14b0fc1edde..20027a23b594 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/exec_target.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/exec_target.c @@ -7,10 +7,16 @@ */ #define _GNU_SOURCE -#include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> void _start(void) {
- syscall(SYS_exit, 0);
- asm volatile (
"li %%r0, %[sys_exit];""li %%r3, 0;""sc;":: [sys_exit] "i" (SYS_exit): "r0", "r3"- );
That looks ok because SYS_exit() is not supposed to return, but in the general case you should take a lot more precautions regarding which registers get clobbered when using sc.
That's my fault for just blurting out that diff on slack without thinking about it too hard.
We should probably just add the proper clobbers, in case anyone copies it in future. Which should be:
asm volatile ( "li %%r0, %[sys_exit];" "li %%r3, 0;" "sc;" : : [sys_exit] "i" (SYS_exit) : "r0", "r3", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11", "r12", "r13", "cr0", "ctr", "xer", "memory" );
cheers