The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support. The test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped with a pass.
Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell anders.roxell@linaro.org --- tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c index 365c32e84189..9245c14165b7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c @@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ int main(void) { int *rcv_fd, nodes;
- if (numa_available() < 0) - error(1, errno, "no numa api support"); + if (numa_available() < 0) { + fprintf(stderr, "no numa api support"); + return 0; + }
nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;