On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 08:00:37AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Nicolin Chen nicolinc@nvidia.com Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 2:38 PM
@@ -128,6 +142,9 @@ struct iommufd_viommu_ops { const struct iommu_user_data *user_data); int (*cache_invalidate)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu, struct iommu_user_data_array *array);
- struct iommufd_vdevice *(*vdevice_alloc)(struct iommufd_viommu
*viommu,
struct device *dev, u64 id);s/id/virt_id/ would be clearer.
OK.
@@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ struct iommufd_viommu_ops { int (*cache_invalidate)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu, struct iommu_user_data_array *array); struct iommufd_vdevice *(*vdevice_alloc)(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu, - struct device *dev, u64 id); + struct device *dev, + u64 virt_id); void (*vdevice_destroy)(struct iommufd_vdevice *vdev); };
Thanks Nicolin