18 Mar
2024
18 Mar
'24
4:52 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 04:11:41PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
yes. how about your opinion? @Jason. I noticed the set_dev_pasid callback and pasid_array update is under the group->lock, so update it should be fine to adjust the order to update pasid_array after set_dev_pasid returns.
Yes, it makes some sense
But, also I would like it very much if we just have the core pass in the actual old domain as a an addition function argument.
I think we have some small mistakes in multi-device group error unwinding for remove because the global xarray can't isn't actually going to be correct in all scenarios.
Jason