On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 20:28, Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:24:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
From: José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com
Add a new procedural macro (`#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]`) to run KUnit tests using a user-space like syntax.
The macro, that should be used on modules, transforms every `#[test]` in a `kunit_case!` and adds a `kunit_unsafe_test_suite!` registering all of them.
The only difference with user-space tests is that instead of using `#[cfg(test)]`, `#[kunit_tests(kunit_test_suit_name)]` is used.
Note that `#[cfg(CONFIG_KUNIT)]` is added so the test module is not compiled when `CONFIG_KUNIT` is set to `n`.
Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com [Updated to use new const fn.] Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720-rustbind-v1-2-c80db349e3b5@google.com/
- Rebased on top of rust-next
- Make use of the new const functions, rather than the kunit_case!() macro.
MAINTAINERS | 1 + rust/kernel/kunit.rs | 11 +++++++++++ rust/macros/lib.rs | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index b77f4495dcf4..b65035ede675 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -12433,6 +12433,7 @@ F: Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/ F: include/kunit/ F: lib/kunit/ F: rust/kernel/kunit.rs +F: rust/macros/kunit.rs
I cannot find this file in this series, and it's not in the current rust-next either.
(Did you do the same thing as I sometimes did: forget to `git add` a new file?)
Whoops! Thanks for catching this: I somehow managed to unstage it while editing things. Fixed in v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20241030045719.3085147-6-davidgow@go...
Cheers, -- David