On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 05:02, Wander Lairson Costa wander@redhat.com wrote:
If the device register fails, free the allocated memory before returning.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa wander@redhat.com Fixes: d03c720e03bd ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Thanks.
I'm not sure this is correct, though... Shouldn't put_device() free this for us?
The documentation for device_register() says to never free a device after device_register() has been called, even if it fails: https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/infrastructure.html#c.device_register
Or am I missing something?
Cheers, -- David
lib/kunit/device.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/device.c b/lib/kunit/device.c index 25c81ed465fb..bc2e2032e505 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/device.c +++ b/lib/kunit/device.c @@ -119,10 +119,8 @@ static struct kunit_device *kunit_device_register_internal(struct kunit *test, kunit_dev->owner = test;
err = dev_set_name(&kunit_dev->dev, "%s.%s", test->name, name);
if (err) {
kfree(kunit_dev);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
if (err)
goto error; kunit_dev->dev.release = kunit_device_release; kunit_dev->dev.bus = &kunit_bus_type;
@@ -131,7 +129,7 @@ static struct kunit_device *kunit_device_register_internal(struct kunit *test, err = device_register(&kunit_dev->dev); if (err) { put_device(&kunit_dev->dev);
return ERR_PTR(err);
goto error; } kunit_dev->dev.dma_mask = &kunit_dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
@@ -140,6 +138,9 @@ static struct kunit_device *kunit_device_register_internal(struct kunit *test, kunit_add_action(test, device_unregister_wrapper, &kunit_dev->dev);
return kunit_dev;
+error:
kfree(kunit_dev);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
/*
2.44.0