Re: [PATCH v6 16/33] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:55:29PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:

A lot of this patch and the previous one is similar to x86's and arm's. It great that we can have consistency around this behavior.

There might be enough consistency to refactor some of the arch code into a kernel/shstk.c.

Should we try?

I think so - I think we discussed it before. I was thinking of looking at it once the clone3() stuff settles down, I don't want to trigger any unneeded refectorings there and cause further delays.