RE: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks

…

...

This patch extends the …

Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an improved change description? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu... entation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94

will fix in next version

…

...

+++ b/kernel/hung_task.c

… @@ -229,9 +232,11 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout) …

...

trace_sched_process_hang(t);

• if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) {

• if (sysctl_hung_task_panic &&

• 	(total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic)) {
  

…

I suggest to use the following source code variant instead.

if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic) {

will fix in next version

thanks

-Li

Regards, Markus