On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:31:20 +0000, Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com wrote:
@@ -216,6 +221,9 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[])
case 'm': test_args.migration_freq_ms = atoi_non_negative("Frequency", optarg); break;
case 'e':
test_args.timer_err_margin_us = atoi_non_negative("Error Margin", optarg);
break;
So your error margin is always unsigned...
case 'o': test_args.counter_offset = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0); test_args.reserved = 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h index 968257b893a7..b1d405e7157d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct test_args { int nr_iter; int timer_period_ms; int migration_freq_ms;
- int timer_err_margin_us;
... except that you are storing it as a signed value. Some consistency wouldn't hurt, really, and would avoid issues when passing large values.
M.