From: Yang Guang yang.guang5@zte.com.cn
Running the seccomp tests under the kernel with "defconfig" shouldn't fail. Because the CONFIG_USER_NS is not supported in "defconfig". Skipping this case instead of failing it is better.
Signed-off-by: Yang Guang yang.guang5@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: David Yang davidcomponentone@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
--- Changes from v1->v2: - Modify the commit message to better understand. --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 313bb0cbfb1e..e9a61cb2eb88 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -3742,7 +3742,10 @@ TEST(user_notification_fault_recv) struct seccomp_notif req = {}; struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {};
- ASSERT_EQ(unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER), 0); + ASSERT_EQ(unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER), 0) { + if (errno == EINVAL) + SKIP(return, "kernel missing CLONE_NEWUSER support"); + }
listener = user_notif_syscall(__NR_getppid, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER);