17 Oct
2019
17 Oct
'19
8:54 a.m.
On 10/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
And why task_ if it accepts pid+pid_type? May be pid_has_task() or something like this...
Given what I said above that might be a decent name.
OK, since I can't suggest a better name I won't really argue. Feel free to add my reviewed-by to this series.
No, naming is important. Thanks for being picky about that too and I'll happily resend. :)
Thanks ;) May be pid_in_use() ? Up to you, anything which starts with pid_ looks better to me than task_alive().
Oleg.