Clang noticed that some none-zero sleep()s were actually using zero anyway. This switches to nanosleep() to gain sub-second granularity.
seccomp_bpf.c:2625:9: warning: implicit conversion from 'double' to 'unsigned int' changes value from 0.1 to 0 [-Wliteral-conversion] sleep(0.1); ~~~~~ ^~~
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 067cb4607d6c..a9f278c13f13 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -2569,6 +2569,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) { long ret, sib; void *status; + struct timespec delay = { .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
ASSERT_EQ(0, prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) { TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!"); @@ -2622,7 +2623,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) EXPECT_EQ(SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED, (long)status); /* Poll for actual task death. pthread_join doesn't guarantee it. */ while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0)) - sleep(0.1); + nanosleep(&delay, NULL); /* Switch to the remaining sibling */ sib = !sib;
@@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_not_under_filter) EXPECT_EQ(0, (long)status); /* Poll for actual task death. pthread_join doesn't guarantee it. */ while (!kill(self->sibling[sib].system_tid, 0)) - sleep(0.1); + nanosleep(&delay, NULL);
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, &self->apply_prog);