On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:06:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:22:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
(There were some kernel test robot complaints as well, valid or not I am not sure.)
You mean in relation with nolibc stuff (or nolibc-test) or something totally different ?
Apologies, this was me being confused and failing to look closely.
The complaints were not about nolibc, but rather about my patches that they were on top of. Not your problem!
Ah no problem :-)
And please let me know when the next batch from your tree are ready to go. (You might have been saying that they were in your recent emails, but I thought I should double-check.)
No pb, I just sent it while you were writing and our emails have crossed :-)
In short, it's ready now with branch 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a but if you need any more info (more detailed summary, a public repost of the whole series etc), just let me know. And I faced 2 kernel build errors on s390x and riscv about rcu_task something, though you might be interested :-/
And I pulled them in and got this from "make run":
138 test(s) passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed.[ 2.416045] reboot: Power down
And this from "make run-user":
136 test(s) passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /home/git/linux-rcu/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out
And run.out looks as it has before, so all looks good at this end.
Thus, unless you tell me otherwise, I will move these to my nolibc branch for the upcoming merge window.
Perfect, thank you very much Paul!
Willy