On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
There are a couple of spelling mistakes in ksft_test_result_fail messages. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c index 1dd94197da30..6838c561e4c9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c @@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ int main(void) ksft_print_msg("vl = %lu\n", vl); if (datap[0] != 0x00 && datap[0] != 0xff) {
ksft_test_result_fail("v-regesters are not properly initialized\n");
ksft_test_result_fail("v-registers are not properly initialized\n");for (i = 1; i < vl * 4; i++) { if (datap[i] != datap[0]) {
ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on v-regesters\n");
ksft_test_result_fail("detect stale values on v-registers\n"); dump(datap, vl * 4); exit(-2);-- 2.39.2
linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
I fixed this and some incorrect error reporting in a different patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240724-xtheadvector-v8-12-cf043168e137@rivosi...
- Charlie