RE: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Direct Map Removal for guest_memfd

On 2024-11-04 at 08:33+0000, Elena Reshetova wrote:

This statement *is* for integrity section. We have a separate TDX guidance on side-channels (including speculative) [3] and some speculative attacks that affect confidentiality (for example spectre v1) are listed as not covered by TDX but remaining SW responsibility (as they are now).

Thanks for the additional info, Elena. Given that clarification, I definitely see direct map removal and TDX as complementary.

Derek