Hi Maciej,
The subject mentions "helpers" (plural) that may not be accurate anymore.
On 2/5/2024 4:08 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
The CAT non-contiguous selftests have to read the file responsible for reporting support of non-contiguous CBMs in kernel (resctrl). Then the test compares if that information matches what is reported by CPUID output.
Add a generic helper function to read an unsigned number from a file in /sys/fs/resctrl/info/<RESOURCE>/<FILE>.
The "a file in" above can be dropped or it should read "from a file in /sys/fs/resctrl/info/<RESOURCE>".
Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com
Changelog v4:
- Rewrite function comment.
- Redo ksft_perror() as ksft_print_msg(). (Reinette)
Changelog v3:
- Rewrite patch message.
- Add documentation and rewrote the function. (Reinette)
Changelog v2:
- Add this patch.
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h index a1462029998e..5116ea082d03 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ unsigned int count_contiguous_bits(unsigned long val, unsigned int *start); int get_full_cbm(const char *cache_type, unsigned long *mask); int get_mask_no_shareable(const char *cache_type, unsigned long *mask); int get_cache_size(int cpu_no, const char *cache_type, unsigned long *cache_size); +int resource_info_unsigned_get(const char *resource, const char *filename, unsigned int *val); void ctrlc_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *ptr); int signal_handler_register(void); void signal_handler_unregister(void); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c index 5750662cce57..e0fbc46a917a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c @@ -249,6 +249,42 @@ static int get_bit_mask(const char *filename, unsigned long *mask) return 0; } +/**
Apologies for not being clear in my previous comment. I do not think we want to start exposing resctrl selftest comments to the kernel-doc tool using this change. The tests are using kernel-doc style but this is done outside from the kernel-doc tool's view.
- resource_info_unsigned_get - Read an unsigned value from
- /sys/fs/resctrl/info/RESOURCE/FILENAME
- @resource: Resource name that matches directory name in
/sys/fs/resctrl/info
- @filename: File in /sys/fs/resctrl/info/@resource
- @val: Contains read value on success.
- Return: = 0 on success, < 0 on failure. On success the read
- value is saved into the @val.
It can just be "saved into @val"
- */
+int resource_info_unsigned_get(const char *resource, const char *filename,
unsigned int *val)
+{
- char file_path[PATH_MAX];
- FILE *fp;
- snprintf(file_path, sizeof(file_path), "%s/%s/%s", INFO_PATH, resource,
filename);
- fp = fopen(file_path, "r");
- if (!fp) {
ksft_print_msg("Error in opening %s\n: %m\n", file_path);
return -1;
- }
Apart from Ilpo's comment this can also just be "Error opening %s: ..."
- if (fscanf(fp, "%u", val) <= 0) {
ksft_print_msg("Could not get contents of %s\n: %m\n", file_path);
fclose(fp);
return -1;
- }
- fclose(fp);
- return 0;
+}
/*
- create_bit_mask- Create bit mask from start, len pair
- @start: LSB of the mask
Reinette