23 Sep
2022
23 Sep
'22
12:21 p.m.
On 2022-09-23 13:34, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
# Check blackhole entries can be replaced. bridge fdb replace `mac_get $h2` dev $swp2 master static bridge fdb get `mac_get $h2` br br0 | grep -q blackhole check_fail $? "Blackhole entry found after replacement"
There seems to be a problem with replacing blackhole fdb entries as fdb_find_rcu() does not find the associated fdb entry (addr, vid) and I don't know why that is the case?
I realize that the reason why fdb_find_rcu() does not find the entry is surely that it is stored in the bridge device fdb and not 'master' fdb.