I've left the names as-is for now in v2, https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210503205835.1370850-2-dlatypov@go... I could send a v3 w/ the rename and see if anyone complains, but I'm tempted to push that off.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:43 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:16 PM Nico Pache npache@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Can we change this to CONFIG_LIST_SORT_KUNIT_TEST to follow the convention used by other KUNIT tests?
I mentioned this in the commit description briefly, but I don't know who is using this test. Nor do I really know who to ask. So I didn't want to risk breaking anyone's workflow for now (more than now requiring them to set CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m).
Side note: maybe CONFIG_KUNIT can default to =y when DEBUG_KERNEL is set? Then there'd be even less change than how this worked before...
If it's not a concern, I'll happily update the file name and config option to follow the conventions.
Maintainers? thoughts? I recently posted patches to convert some of the other tests that break this format [1].
Cheers,
-- Nico
[1] - https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/4/14/310
On 4/21/21 2:32 PM, Daniel Latypov wrote:
[SNIP...] config TEST_LIST_SORT
tristate "Linked list sorting test"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL || m
tristate "Linked list sorting test" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
depends on KUNIT
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
[SNAP...]
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/d7b2b598-7087-0445-4647-8521f323....