On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:51 AM Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com wrote:
Add basic support to run QEMU via kunit_tool. Add support for i386, x86_64, arm, arm64, and a bunch more.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
I've tested this out on a few architectures (x86-32, ppc64, etc), and it all seems to work pretty well. I've got quite a few comments below. The main one -- the location of the qemu configs -- is basically echoing what Daniel said and what you've done on the Gerrit version, but I felt was worth having on the record.
Otherwise, a bunch of nitpicks around missing places cross_compile should be supported.
Still, great to see this happening: it's nice to be able to test on non-UML architectures more easily.
Tested-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
-- David
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 33 +++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 2 +- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 15 +- 4 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py index d5144fcb03acd..07ef80062873b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py @@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree, kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp('Building KUnit Kernel ...')
build_start = time.time()
success = linux.build_um_kernel(request.alltests,
request.jobs,
request.build_dir,
request.make_options)
success = linux.build_kernel(request.alltests,
request.jobs,
request.build_dir,
request.make_options) build_end = time.time() if not success: return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
@@ -187,6 +187,14 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None: help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests', metavar='kunitconfig')
parser.add_argument('--arch',
help='Specifies the architecture to run tests under.',
type=str, default='um', metavar='arch')
It'd be nice to note explicitly that non-'um' values here will run under qemu.
parser.add_argument('--cross_compile',
help='Sets make\'s CROSS_COMPILE variable.',
metavar='cross_compile')
It'd be nice to have a slightly more detailed description here (that its the compiler name's prefix or something).
def add_build_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--jobs', help='As in the make command, "Specifies the number of ' @@ -268,7 +276,10 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch,
cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile) request = KunitRequest(cli_args.raw_output, cli_args.timeout,
@@ -287,7 +298,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch) request = KunitConfigRequest(cli_args.build_dir, cli_args.make_options)
@@ -299,7 +312,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): sys.exit(1) elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build': if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch)
Why aren't we passing cross_compile through here? It's pretty important for the 'build' step.
request = KunitBuildRequest(cli_args.jobs, cli_args.build_dir,
@@ -313,7 +328,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): sys.exit(1) elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec': if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch) exec_request = KunitExecRequest(cli_args.timeout, cli_args.build_dir,
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py index 1e2683dcc0e7a..07d76be392544 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ class Kconfig(object): return True
def write_to_file(self, path: str) -> None:
with open(path, 'w') as f:
with open(path, 'a+') as f: for entry in self.entries(): f.write(str(entry) + '\n')
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index 7d5b77967d48f..b8b3b76aaa17e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ from typing import Iterator
from contextlib import ExitStack
+from collections import namedtuple
import kunit_config import kunit_parser
@@ -40,6 +42,10 @@ class BuildError(Exception): class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): """An abstraction over command line operations performed on a source tree."""
def __init__(self, linux_arch, cross_compile):
self._linux_arch = linux_arch
self._cross_compile = cross_compile
def make_mrproper(self) -> None: try: subprocess.check_output(['make', 'mrproper'], stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
@@ -48,12 +54,18 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, build_dir):
pass
def make_olddefconfig(self, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=um', 'olddefconfig']
command = ['make', 'ARCH=' + self._linux_arch, 'olddefconfig']
if self._cross_compile:
command += ['CROSS_COMPILE=' + self._cross_compile] if make_options: command.extend(make_options) if build_dir: command += ['O=' + build_dir]
print(' '.join(command)) try: subprocess.check_output(command, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) except OSError as e:
@@ -61,6 +73,154 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
def make(self, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=' + self._linux_arch, '--jobs=' + str(jobs)]
if make_options:
command.extend(make_options)
if self._cross_compile:
command += ['CROSS_COMPILE=' + self._cross_compile]
if build_dir:
command += ['O=' + build_dir]
print(' '.join(command))
try:
proc = subprocess.Popen(command,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL)
except OSError as e:
raise BuildError('Could not call execute make: ' + e)
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
raise BuildError(e.output)
_, stderr = proc.communicate()
if proc.returncode != 0:
raise BuildError(stderr.decode())
if stderr: # likely only due to build warnings
print(stderr.decode())
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile) -> None:
pass
+QemuArchParams = namedtuple('QemuArchParams', ['linux_arch',
'qemuconfig',
'qemu_arch',
'kernel_path',
'kernel_command_line',
'extra_qemu_params'])
+QEMU_ARCHS = {
'i386' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='i386',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
I'm not keen on these configs being condensed like this in the source. As mentioned below, moving the QemuArchParams to a separate file helps, but even then it'd be nice to at least have each entry on a separate line like with 'arm' below.
The other option would be to have this as a path to a separate Kconfig/.kunitconfig file with these configs, rather than having them inline here. I fear that could lead to every architecture needing several support files, though some (e.g. x86/x86_64/alpha/sparc) could share a file.
qemu_arch='x86_64',
kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'x86_64' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='x86_64',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='x86_64',
kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'arm' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm',
qemuconfig='''CONFIG_ARCH_VIRT=y
+CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
qemu_arch='arm',
kernel_path='arch/arm/boot/zImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt']),
'arm64' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm64',
qemuconfig='''CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y
+CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
qemu_arch='aarch64',
kernel_path='arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt', '-cpu cortex-a57']),
'alpha' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='alpha',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='alpha',
kernel_path='arch/alpha/boot/vmlinux',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'powerpc' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='powerpc',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_PPC64=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y\nCONFIG_HVC_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='ppc64',
kernel_path='vmlinux',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['-M pseries', '-cpu power8']),
'riscv' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='riscv',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SOC_VIRT=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y',
qemu_arch='riscv64',
kernel_path='arch/riscv/boot/Image',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt', '-cpu rv64', '-bios opensbi-riscv64-generic-fw_dynamic.bin']),
's390' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='s390',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_EXPERT=y\nCONFIG_TUNE_ZEC12=y\nCONFIG_NUMA=y\nCONFIG_MODULES=y',
qemu_arch='s390x',
kernel_path='arch/s390/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=[
'-machine s390-ccw-virtio',
'-cpu qemu',]),
'sparc' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='sparc',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='sparc',
kernel_path='arch/sparc/boot/zImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0 mem=256M',
extra_qemu_params=['-m 256']),
+}
So, as mentioned, I agree with Daniel in thinking that this really doesn't belong here. Ideally, I think these configs should be specified somewhere else, either as a (alas, very long) series of command-line arguments, or in a separate file. Moving them to a single 'qemu_configs.py' as Daniel mentioned would be an improvement, but IMHO still falls well short of ideal. I think each config should be in its own file, as there are several reasons someone might want to have multiple different configs for a given architecture and we'll want people to be able to add/remove these easily in their own environments.
The proposed solution of having each config in a separate file -- which we discussed offline -- is a big improvement: https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/4489
I still think that the python format here is a bit verbose and ugly, but it's probably worth it compared to adding a parser for a whole new type of config file. Similarly, I'm not sure about keeping a separate qemu_configs.py around with the builtin defaults rather than just having them all as separate files all the time. (Even appreciating that that requires some filename magic to find the correct file.) These are all more nitpicky though.
+class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
def __init__(self, qemu_arch_params, cross_compile):
super().__init__(linux_arch=qemu_arch_params.linux_arch,
cross_compile=cross_compile)
self._qemuconfig = qemu_arch_params.qemuconfig
self._qemu_arch = qemu_arch_params.qemu_arch
self._kernel_path = qemu_arch_params.kernel_path
print(self._kernel_path)
self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot'
self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, build_dir):
qemuconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
qemuconfig.parse_from_string(self._qemuconfig)
qemuconfig.write_to_file(get_kconfig_path(build_dir))
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile):
kernel_path = os.path.join(build_dir, self._kernel_path)
qemu_command = ['qemu-system-' + self._qemu_arch,
'-nodefaults',
'-m', '1024',
'-kernel', kernel_path,
'-append', '\'' + ' '.join(params + [self._kernel_command_line]) + '\'',
'-no-reboot',
'-nographic',
'-serial stdio'] + self._extra_qemu_params
print(' '.join(qemu_command))
with open(outfile, 'w') as output:
process = subprocess.Popen(' '.join(qemu_command),
stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=output,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
text=True, shell=True)
try:
process.wait(timeout=timeout)
except Exception as e:
print(e)
process.terminate()
return process
+class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
"""An abstraction over command line operations performed on a source tree."""
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=None)
Why is cross_compile None here? Shouldn't it be possible to cross compile UML kernels? (This should, I think, be possible for i386 on an x86_64 host, for instance.)
def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir, make_options) -> None: kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...')
@@ -83,32 +243,16 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Starting Kernel with all configs takes a few minutes...')
def make(self, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=um', '--jobs=' + str(jobs)]
if make_options:
command.extend(make_options)
if build_dir:
command += ['O=' + build_dir]
try:
proc = subprocess.Popen(command,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL)
except OSError as e:
raise BuildError('Could not call make command: ' + str(e))
_, stderr = proc.communicate()
if proc.returncode != 0:
raise BuildError(stderr.decode())
if stderr: # likely only due to build warnings
print(stderr.decode())
def linux_bin(self, params, timeout, build_dir) -> None:
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile): """Runs the Linux UML binary. Must be named 'linux'.""" linux_bin = get_file_path(build_dir, 'linux') outfile = get_outfile_path(build_dir) with open(outfile, 'w') as output: process = subprocess.Popen([linux_bin] + params,
stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=output,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
text=True) process.wait(timeout)
def get_kconfig_path(build_dir) -> str: @@ -123,10 +267,17 @@ def get_outfile_path(build_dir) -> str: class LinuxSourceTree(object): """Represents a Linux kernel source tree with KUnit tests."""
def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, kunitconfig_path='') -> None:
def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, kunitconfig_path='', arch=None, cross_compile=None) -> None: signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.signal_handler)
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperations()
self._ops = None
if arch is None or arch == 'um':
self._arch = 'um'
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml()
Again, we should probably pass cross_compile through here.
elif arch in QEMU_ARCHS:
self._arch = arch
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(QEMU_ARCHS[arch], cross_compile=cross_compile)
else:
raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch') if not load_config: return
@@ -170,6 +321,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): os.mkdir(build_dir) self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) try:
self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(build_dir) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) except ConfigError as e: logging.error(e)
@@ -192,10 +344,13 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): print('Generating .config ...') return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
def build_um_kernel(self, alltests, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> bool:
def build_kernel(self, alltests, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> bool: try: if alltests:
if self._arch != 'um':
raise ConfigError('Only the "um" arch is supported for alltests') self._ops.make_allyesconfig(build_dir, make_options)
self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(build_dir) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) self._ops.make(jobs, build_dir, make_options) except (ConfigError, BuildError) as e:
@@ -209,8 +364,8 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): args.extend(['mem=1G', 'console=tty','kunit_shutdown=halt']) if filter_glob: args.append('kunit.filter_glob='+filter_glob)
self._ops.linux_bin(args, timeout, build_dir) outfile = get_outfile_path(build_dir)
self._ops.run(args, timeout, build_dir, outfile) subprocess.call(['stty', 'sane']) with open(outfile, 'r') as file: for line in file:
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 1ad3049e90698..25e8be95a575d 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.linux_source_mock = mock.Mock() self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig = mock.Mock(return_value=True)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=all_passed_log) def test_config_passes_args_pass(self):
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_build_passes_args_pass(self): kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self):
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_build_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, build_dir, None)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, build_dir, None) def test_exec_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit'
@@ -404,14 +404,19 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig')
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
arch='um',
cross_compile=None) @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig')
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
arch='um')
if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main() -- 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog