6 Nov
2025
6 Nov
'25
11:01 a.m.
On 10/30/25 3:34 PM, chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com wrote:
From: Ilpo Järvinen ij@kernel.org
As AccECN may keep CWR bit asserted due to different interpretation of the bit, flushing with GRO because of CWR may effectively disable GRO until AccECN counter field changes such that CWR-bit becomes 0.
There is no harm done from not immediately forwarding the CWR'ed segment with RFC3168 ECN.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen ij@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chia-Yu Chang chia-yu.chang@nokia-bell-labs.com
Please provide a test/update the existing one to cover this case or move to a later series. Possibly both :)
/P