Hi Naresh,
On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present. Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use "modprobe test_bpf"
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org
Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present, we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o having to install it first.
Thanks, Daniel
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh index ed4774d..54177b1 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@ #!/bin/sh # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -SRC_TREE=../../../../
test_run() { sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run() echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]" dmesg -C
- insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
- if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
- # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
- if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"- elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
echo "test_bpf: ok"- else
echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html