On 6/24/20 3:23 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 6/24/20 3:01 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap rdunlap@infradead.org wrote:
On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more?
> True that, we can rip the file.
Has anyone fixed the uml build errors?
I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-)
Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it. Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream as soon more fixes queued up.
I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h?
I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple.
But thanks for offering.
I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now.
This is a allyesconfig? I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here.
I'm building linux-next and it fails.
More specifically, uml for i386 fails. x86_64 is OK. The problem is with the <asm/desc.h> file. I'm tampering with it...
But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT.