On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:57 PM Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:21 AM menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
From: Menglong Dong imagedong@tencent.com
With previous patch, kernel is able to 'put_port' after sys_bind() fails. Add the test for that case: rebind another port after sys_bind() fails. If the bind success, it means previous bind operation is already undoed.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong imagedong@tencent.com
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c index e8edd3dd3ec2..68525d68d4e5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c @@ -35,12 +35,15 @@ struct sock_test { /* Endpoint to bind() to */ const char *ip; unsigned short port;
unsigned short port_retry; /* Expected test result */ enum { LOAD_REJECT, ATTACH_REJECT, BIND_REJECT, SUCCESS,
RETRY_SUCCESS,
RETRY_REJECT } result;
};
@@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = { 0, NULL, 0,
0, LOAD_REJECT, },
I assume we tried C99 initializers here, and this failed for some reason ?
Yeah, C99 initializers should be a good choice here, therefore I don't need to change every entry here after I add a new field to 'struct sock_test'.
I think C99 initializers should work here, I'll give it a try.
Thanks! Menglong Dong
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c index e8edd3dd3ec2..b57ce9f3eabf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c @@ -54,13 +54,13 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), },
BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
0,
0,
NULL,
0,
LOAD_REJECT,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
.domain = 0,
.type = 0,
.ip = NULL,
.port = 0,
.result = LOAD_REJECT, }, { "bind4 load with invalid access: mark",