On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:12 AM Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Andrii Nakryiko andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.
While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments in misc tools for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.
Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to tools/scripts/Makefile.include file and add missing includes where needed. Honestly, I was inspired by commit c8a950d0d3b9 ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").
I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.
Build instructions:
[ make and make-options ] MAKE="make V=1" MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1" MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"
[ clean-up ] $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean
[ bpftool ] $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/
[ perf ] PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/
I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler, linker, GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.
Some personal notes:
- I have NOT tested with cross-toolchain for other archs (cross compiler/linker etc.).
- This patch is on top of Linux v5.11-rc3.
I hope to get some feedback from especially Linux-bpf folks.
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com
tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 2 -- tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile | 3 --- tools/build/feature/Makefile | 4 ++-- tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 1 -
for tools/build and tools/perf
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com
It's pretty straightforward and looks good for bpftool and runqslower, but I couldn't apply directly to test due to merge conflicts.
Also, which tree this should go through, given it touches multiple parts under tools/?
Sorry, for the conflicts. AFAICS I should do this again against Linux v5.11-rc4 vanilla? Is this OK to you?
I re-checked: This patch was on top of Linux v5.11-rc3 and applies cleanly against Linux v5.11-rc.
Please let me know if I should adapt to a different Git tree.
- Sedat -
Good hint, cannot say through which tree this should go through.
- Sedat -
jirka
tools/scripts/Makefile.include | 7 +++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 3 +-- tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/Makefile | 3 +-- 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile index f897cb5fb12d..71c14efa6e91 100644 --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
SNIP