Hi Ihor,
On 04/10/2025 05:19, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
On 10/3/25 8:08 PM, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
On 10/3/25 4:37 PM, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
On Fri, 2025-10-03 at 17:24 +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote: [...]
Alan, Ihor, does this sound familiar?
This is most likely the issue addressed in this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/dwarves/f7553b3f-5827-4f50-81a9-9bd0802734b9@linux.d...
There wasn't a new pahole release with it yet.
Not the best link, sorry. That patch wasn't picked up by lore, only discussion remains.
Here is the commit pushed to pahole/next: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/commit/?h=next&id...
Thank you for the links!
OK so I guess to be (fully) able to use BTF in the future v6.18, we should use the future Pahole v1.31, and not include extra kfuncs. Is that correct?
If yes, we can drop this patch. (The MPTCP CI will use it internally not to have to depend on a dev version of Pahole.)
Also, should this dependency be more explicit somehow, to help people having errors when not using a recent enough Pahole version?
Cheers, Matt