Fix spelling mistakes: tmp_trap.c:94 te -> the tmp_trap.c:96 tread -> treated
reported by: codespell
Signed-off-by: Moktar SELLAMI smokthar925@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c index 97cb74768e30..298bd09c55bb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c @@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ void trap_signal_handler(int signo, siginfo_t *si, void *uc) * LE endianness does in effect nothing, instruction (2) * is then executed again as 'trap', generating a second * trap event (note that in that case 'trap' is caught - * not in transacional mode). On te other hand, if after + * not in transacional mode). On the other hand, if after * the return from the signal handler the endianness in- - * advertently flipped, instruction (1) is tread as a + * advertently flipped, instruction (1) is treated as a * branch instruction, i.e. b .+8, hence instruction (3) * and (4) are executed (tbegin.; trap;) and we get sim- * ilaly on the trap signal handler, but now in TM mode.