typo: Subject's LimigtNPROC -> LimitNPROC
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 09:41:44AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Long story short recursively enforcing RLIMIT_NPROC when it is not enforced on the process that creates a new user namespace, causes currently working code to fail. There is no reason to enforce RLIMIT_NPROC recursively when we don't enforce it normally so update the code to detect this case.
I would like to simply use capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) to detect when RLIMIT_NPROC is not enforced upon the caller. Unfortunately because RLIMIT_NPROC is charged and checked for enforcement based upon the real uid, using capable() wich is euid based is inconsistent with reality.
typo: wich -> which
Come as close as possible to testing for capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) by testing for when the real uid would match the conditions when CAP_SYS_RESOURCE would be present if the real uid was the effective uid.
Reported-by: Etienne Dechamps etienne@edechamps.fr Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215596 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9589141-cfeb-90cd-2d0e-83a62787239a@edechamps.fr Fixes: 21d1c5e386bc ("Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" ebiederm@xmission.com
The previous conversation has given me enough clarity that I can see which tests I am comfortable with use for this pending regression fix.
I have tested this and it works for me. Does anyone have any concerns with this change?
I'd really love some kind of selftest that exercises the edge cases; do you have your tests in some form that could be converted?
But otherwise, yes, this looks like the best option here.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org
kernel/user_namespace.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c index 6b2e3ca7ee99..5481ba44a8d6 100644 --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c @@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ static void set_cred_user_ns(struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *user_ns) cred->user_ns = user_ns; } +static unsigned long enforced_nproc_rlimit(void) +{
- unsigned long limit = RLIM_INFINITY;
- /* Is RLIMIT_NPROC currently enforced? */
- if (!uid_eq(current_uid(), GLOBAL_ROOT_UID) ||
(current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns))limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC);- return limit;
+}
/*
- Create a new user namespace, deriving the creator from the user in the
- passed credentials, and replacing that user with the new root user for the
@@ -122,7 +134,7 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new) for (i = 0; i < MAX_PER_NAMESPACE_UCOUNTS; i++) { ns->ucount_max[i] = INT_MAX; }
- set_rlimit_ucount_max(ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC));
- set_rlimit_ucount_max(ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, enforced_nproc_rlimit()); set_rlimit_ucount_max(ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE, rlimit(RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE)); set_rlimit_ucount_max(ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, rlimit(RLIMIT_SIGPENDING)); set_rlimit_ucount_max(ns, UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK));
-- 2.29.2