As mentioned in the comment, the workaround for __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) is only necessary on GCC. Avoid applying the workaround on clang, as clang does not recognize __attribute__((__optimize__)) and would fail.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh linux@weissschuh.net --- tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h index ac212e6185b2..41ebd394b90c 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ _ret; \ })
-#ifndef __powerpc64__ +#if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__clang__) /* FIXME: For 32-bit PowerPC, with newer gcc compilers (e.g. gcc 13.1.0), * "omit-frame-pointer" fails with __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) but * works with __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))