On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:35:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 07:30:35PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Properly resolved by whom? It sounds like you're up for intentionally allowing a userspace regression, and also volunteering other people's time into fixing that regression? The way I understand the kernel development process is that the person proposing a change is responsible for not intentionally causing regressions, and if one is pointed out, a v+1 of that patch is provided that doesn't cause the regression.
If you think the code does not work when the system frequently suspends and resumes, then well it is broken already, as that can happen just as much on non-Android systems.
I don't know how you arrived at that sentence or conclusion. The regression I'm referring to in that paragraph is the one that *your* patch would introduce were it to be applied.
The code currently does work well on Android devices. These very messages are transiting through it, even.
Jason