On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:15:24AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
@@ -512,10 +538,16 @@ static void gcs_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next) gcs_set_el0_mode(next); /*
* Ensure that GCS changes are observable by/from other PEs in* case of migration.
* Ensure that GCS memory effects of the 'prev' thread are* ordered before other memory accesses with release semantics* (or preceded by a DMB) on the current PE. In addition, any* memory accesses with acquire semantics (or succeeded by a* DMB) are ordered before GCS memory effects of the 'next'* thread. This will ensure that the GCS memory effects are */* visible to other PEs in case of migration.
- gcsb_dsync();
- if (task_gcs_el0_enabled(current) || task_gcs_el0_enabled(next))
gcsb_dsync();}
Ah, the comment turned up in this patch. It looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com