On 9/14/22 08:36, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
When we initially submitted the attestation patches, virt/coco folder was not created. I initially kept this driver in platform/x86/, but later moved to arch/x86/coco based on the review comments in v4. There was a discussion about the need for a new config and the location of the driver. The outcome of that discussion is, since this is not a traditional driver, but a basic TDX feature, we don't need a special config and the code can be maintained in the arch/x86/coco folder.
Could you please include the following in this set somewhere:
"The code to do the SEV analog of this TDX functionality is in ___insert_path_here____. This code is different from that because ______reason______ so it is instead placed in ____other_path____."
?