On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:40 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:51 PM Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com wrote:
Add basic support to run QEMU via kunit_tool. Add support for i386, x86_64, arm, arm64, and a bunch more.
Hmmm, I'm wondering if I'm seeing unrelated breakages. Applied these patches on top of 55ba0fe059a5 ("Merge tag 'for-5.13-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux")
$ make mrproper $ rm -rf .kunit/* # just in case $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=arm64 ...
Huh, did you use a arm64 cross compiler? Maybe that's your issue.
ERROR:root:arch/arm64/Makefile:25: ld does not support --fix-cortex-a53-843419; kernel may be susceptible to erratum arch/arm64/Makefile:44: Detected assembler with broken .inst; disassembly will be unreliable gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mlittle-endian’
So it seems like my version of ld might be out of date, but my gcc is 10.2.1 Is there a minimum version of the toolchain this would expect that we can call out in the commit message (and in the Documentation)?
--arch=x86_64 worked just fine for me, however, which is mainly what I was interested in.
I've mainly just left some nits and comments regarding typechecking.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 33 +++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 2 +- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 15 +- 4 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py index d5144fcb03acd..07ef80062873b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py @@ -70,10 +70,10 @@ def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree, kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp('Building KUnit Kernel ...')
build_start = time.time()
success = linux.build_um_kernel(request.alltests,
request.jobs,
request.build_dir,
request.make_options)
success = linux.build_kernel(request.alltests,
request.jobs,
request.build_dir,
request.make_options) build_end = time.time() if not success: return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
@@ -187,6 +187,14 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None: help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests', metavar='kunitconfig')
parser.add_argument('--arch',
help='Specifies the architecture to run tests under.',
optional: perhaps add "(e.g. x86_64, um)" Most people using this would be able to infer that, but I prefer strings that are basically enums to document examples of useful values.
Good point, probably want to mention that I take the string name from the argument passed into the ARCH make variable.
(And x86 is probably the one most people want to use this flag for).
Yep, but Linux refers to it as i386. Just trying to be consistent.
type=str, default='um', metavar='arch')
parser.add_argument('--cross_compile',
help='Sets make\'s CROSS_COMPILE variable.',
metavar='cross_compile')
def add_build_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--jobs', help='As in the make command, "Specifies the number of ' @@ -268,7 +276,10 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch,
cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile) request = KunitRequest(cli_args.raw_output, cli_args.timeout,
@@ -287,7 +298,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch) request = KunitConfigRequest(cli_args.build_dir, cli_args.make_options)
@@ -299,7 +312,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): sys.exit(1) elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build': if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch) request = KunitBuildRequest(cli_args.jobs, cli_args.build_dir,
@@ -313,7 +328,9 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): sys.exit(1) elif cli_args.subcommand == 'exec': if not linux:
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir)
linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir,
kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig,
arch=cli_args.arch) exec_request = KunitExecRequest(cli_args.timeout, cli_args.build_dir,
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py index 1e2683dcc0e7a..07d76be392544 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ class Kconfig(object): return True
def write_to_file(self, path: str) -> None:
with open(path, 'w') as f:
with open(path, 'a+') as f:
I might be missing something, but do we need this?
w => a means we wouldn't truncate the file if it exists. I can imagine I'm missing something that makes it necessary.
- => opens for read/write: we don't do any reads with f afaict.
Yeah, probably only needs to be a, not a+. But we do want append for adding the arch configs. Idea is that we want to append those onto whatever a base kunitconfig.
Nevertheless, your concern is valid, might be a better way to do this. Thoughts?
for entry in self.entries(): f.write(str(entry) + '\n')
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index 7d5b77967d48f..b8b3b76aaa17e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ from typing import Iterator
from contextlib import ExitStack
+from collections import namedtuple
import kunit_config import kunit_parser
@@ -40,6 +42,10 @@ class BuildError(Exception): class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): """An abstraction over command line operations performed on a source tree."""
def __init__(self, linux_arch, cross_compile):
nit: let's annotate these as `linux_arch: str, cross_compile: str` (or is it Optional[str] here?) I can see a reader thinking arch might be an enum and that cross_compile might be a bool.
Fair. Will do.
self._linux_arch = linux_arch
self._cross_compile = cross_compile
def make_mrproper(self) -> None: try: subprocess.check_output(['make', 'mrproper'], stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
@@ -48,12 +54,18 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, build_dir):
pass
def make_olddefconfig(self, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=um', 'olddefconfig']
command = ['make', 'ARCH=' + self._linux_arch, 'olddefconfig']
if self._cross_compile:
command += ['CROSS_COMPILE=' + self._cross_compile] if make_options: command.extend(make_options) if build_dir: command += ['O=' + build_dir]
print(' '.join(command)) try: subprocess.check_output(command, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) except OSError as e:
@@ -61,6 +73,154 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: raise ConfigError(e.output.decode())
def make(self, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=' + self._linux_arch, '--jobs=' + str(jobs)]
if make_options:
command.extend(make_options)
if self._cross_compile:
command += ['CROSS_COMPILE=' + self._cross_compile]
if build_dir:
command += ['O=' + build_dir]
print(' '.join(command))
try:
proc = subprocess.Popen(command,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL)
except OSError as e:
raise BuildError('Could not call execute make: ' + e)
pytype complains about this. You'd want `+ str(e)`
Got it. Will do. (I should probably also run pytype.)
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
raise BuildError(e.output)
_, stderr = proc.communicate()
if proc.returncode != 0:
raise BuildError(stderr.decode())
if stderr: # likely only due to build warnings
print(stderr.decode())
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile) -> None:
pass
+QemuArchParams = namedtuple('QemuArchParams', ['linux_arch',
'qemuconfig',
'qemu_arch',
'kernel_path',
'kernel_command_line',
'extra_qemu_params'])
+QEMU_ARCHS = {
'i386' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='i386',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='x86_64',
kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'x86_64' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='x86_64',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='x86_64',
kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'arm' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm',
qemuconfig='''CONFIG_ARCH_VIRT=y
+CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
qemu_arch='arm',
kernel_path='arch/arm/boot/zImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt']),
'arm64' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='arm64',
qemuconfig='''CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010=y
+CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL010_CONSOLE=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011=y +CONFIG_SERIAL_AMBA_PL011_CONSOLE=y''',
qemu_arch='aarch64',
kernel_path='arch/arm64/boot/Image.gz',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyAMA0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt', '-cpu cortex-a57']),
'alpha' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='alpha',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='alpha',
kernel_path='arch/alpha/boot/vmlinux',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['']),
'powerpc' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='powerpc',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_PPC64=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y\nCONFIG_HVC_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='ppc64',
kernel_path='vmlinux',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['-M pseries', '-cpu power8']),
'riscv' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='riscv',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SOC_VIRT=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON_RISCV_SBI=y',
qemu_arch='riscv64',
kernel_path='arch/riscv/boot/Image',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=['-machine virt', '-cpu rv64', '-bios opensbi-riscv64-generic-fw_dynamic.bin']),
's390' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='s390',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_EXPERT=y\nCONFIG_TUNE_ZEC12=y\nCONFIG_NUMA=y\nCONFIG_MODULES=y',
qemu_arch='s390x',
kernel_path='arch/s390/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=[
'-machine s390-ccw-virtio',
'-cpu qemu',]),
'sparc' : QemuArchParams(linux_arch='sparc',
qemuconfig='CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y\nCONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y',
qemu_arch='sparc',
kernel_path='arch/sparc/boot/zImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0 mem=256M',
extra_qemu_params=['-m 256']),
+}
Oh my. I don't know enough to say if there's a better way of doing this.
Yeah, I know it's gross, but I did not want to put too much effort into until I got some feedback on it.
But I think we should probably split this out into a separate python file, if this mapping remains necessary. E.g. in a qemu_configs.py file or the like.
Definitely an improvement. Any other thoughts on how to make this look less gross?
+class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
I've called out the two errors pytype gives already, but mypy is even worse about this new class :(
$ mypy tools/testing/kunit/*.py tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:90: error: Unsupported operand types for + ("str" and "OSError") tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:278: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu", variable has type "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]") tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:298: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_mrproper" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:324: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_arch_qemuconfig" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:325: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_olddefconfig" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:352: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_allyesconfig" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:353: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_arch_qemuconfig" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:354: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make_olddefconfig" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:355: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "make" tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py:368: error: Item "None" of "Optional[LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml]" has no attribute "run"
So to make up for mypy being less smart, we can do this and get it down 2 errors
Sounds good. Will do.
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index b8b3b76aaa17..a0aaa28db4c1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import subprocess import os import shutil import signal -from typing import Iterator +from typing import Iterator, Union
from contextlib import ExitStack
@@ -269,15 +269,16 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object):
def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True,
kunitconfig_path='', arch=None, cross_compile=None) -> None: signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.signal_handler)
self._ops = None
ops = None # type: Union[None,
LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml, LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu] if arch is None or arch == 'um': self._arch = 'um'
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml()
ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml() elif arch in QEMU_ARCHS: self._arch = arch
self._ops =
LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(QEMU_ARCHS[arch], cross_compile=cross_compile)
ops =
LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(QEMU_ARCHS[arch], cross_compile=cross_compile) else: raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch')
self._ops = ops if not load_config: return
def __init__(self, qemu_arch_params, cross_compile):
super().__init__(linux_arch=qemu_arch_params.linux_arch,
cross_compile=cross_compile)
self._qemuconfig = qemu_arch_params.qemuconfig
self._qemu_arch = qemu_arch_params.qemu_arch
self._kernel_path = qemu_arch_params.kernel_path
print(self._kernel_path)
looks like a leftover debugging print statement?
Oh yeah. Whoops.
self._kernel_command_line = qemu_arch_params.kernel_command_line + ' kunit_shutdown=reboot'
self._extra_qemu_params = qemu_arch_params.extra_qemu_params
def make_arch_qemuconfig(self, build_dir):
qemuconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig()
qemuconfig.parse_from_string(self._qemuconfig)
qemuconfig.write_to_file(get_kconfig_path(build_dir))
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile):
kernel_path = os.path.join(build_dir, self._kernel_path)
qemu_command = ['qemu-system-' + self._qemu_arch,
'-nodefaults',
'-m', '1024',
'-kernel', kernel_path,
'-append', '\'' + ' '.join(params + [self._kernel_command_line]) + '\'',
'-no-reboot',
'-nographic',
'-serial stdio'] + self._extra_qemu_params
print(' '.join(qemu_command))
ditto, a debug statement? Though this one could be useful to actually print out for the user if we include some more context in the message.
Yeah, this was initially a debug, but then I ended up finding it pretty useful since it spits out a full qemu command that you can just run outside of the tool, so I left it in.
with open(outfile, 'w') as output:
process = subprocess.Popen(' '.join(qemu_command),
stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=output,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
text=True, shell=True)
try:
process.wait(timeout=timeout)
except Exception as e:
print(e)
process.terminate()
return process
+class LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(LinuxSourceTreeOperations):
"""An abstraction over command line operations performed on a source tree."""
def __init__(self):
super().__init__(linux_arch='um', cross_compile=None)
def make_allyesconfig(self, build_dir, make_options) -> None: kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Enabling all CONFIGs for UML...')
@@ -83,32 +243,16 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeOperations(object): kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp( 'Starting Kernel with all configs takes a few minutes...')
def make(self, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> None:
command = ['make', 'ARCH=um', '--jobs=' + str(jobs)]
if make_options:
command.extend(make_options)
if build_dir:
command += ['O=' + build_dir]
try:
proc = subprocess.Popen(command,
stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL)
except OSError as e:
raise BuildError('Could not call make command: ' + str(e))
_, stderr = proc.communicate()
if proc.returncode != 0:
raise BuildError(stderr.decode())
if stderr: # likely only due to build warnings
print(stderr.decode())
def linux_bin(self, params, timeout, build_dir) -> None:
def run(self, params, timeout, build_dir, outfile): """Runs the Linux UML binary. Must be named 'linux'.""" linux_bin = get_file_path(build_dir, 'linux') outfile = get_outfile_path(build_dir) with open(outfile, 'w') as output: process = subprocess.Popen([linux_bin] + params,
stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=output,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
text=True) process.wait(timeout)
def get_kconfig_path(build_dir) -> str: @@ -123,10 +267,17 @@ def get_outfile_path(build_dir) -> str: class LinuxSourceTree(object): """Represents a Linux kernel source tree with KUnit tests."""
def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, kunitconfig_path='') -> None:
def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, kunitconfig_path='', arch=None, cross_compile=None) -> None: signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.signal_handler)
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperations()
self._ops = None
if arch is None or arch == 'um':
self._arch = 'um'
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml()
elif arch in QEMU_ARCHS:
self._arch = arch
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperationsQemu(QEMU_ARCHS[arch], cross_compile=cross_compile)
else:
raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch') if not load_config: return
@@ -170,6 +321,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): os.mkdir(build_dir) self._kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) try:
self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(build_dir) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) except ConfigError as e: logging.error(e)
@@ -192,10 +344,13 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): print('Generating .config ...') return self.build_config(build_dir, make_options)
def build_um_kernel(self, alltests, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> bool:
def build_kernel(self, alltests, jobs, build_dir, make_options) -> bool: try: if alltests:
if self._arch != 'um':
raise ConfigError('Only the "um" arch is supported for alltests') self._ops.make_allyesconfig(build_dir, make_options)
Minor note: pytype doesn't like this. The code is correct, but pytype can't figure out that ops can't be the QEMU variant.
Pytype recognizes comments like " # pytype: disable=attribute-error" but mypy doesn't. So I don't know that there's a way we can make both of them happy :/
Hmmm...I could just add make_allyesconfig() to the base class and make it raise. That might be cleaner too.
self._ops.make_arch_qemuconfig(build_dir) self._ops.make_olddefconfig(build_dir, make_options) self._ops.make(jobs, build_dir, make_options) except (ConfigError, BuildError) as e:
@@ -209,8 +364,8 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): args.extend(['mem=1G', 'console=tty','kunit_shutdown=halt']) if filter_glob: args.append('kunit.filter_glob='+filter_glob)
self._ops.linux_bin(args, timeout, build_dir) outfile = get_outfile_path(build_dir)
self._ops.run(args, timeout, build_dir, outfile) subprocess.call(['stty', 'sane']) with open(outfile, 'r') as file: for line in file:
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 1ad3049e90698..25e8be95a575d 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.linux_source_mock = mock.Mock() self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig = mock.Mock(return_value=True)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=all_passed_log) def test_config_passes_args_pass(self):
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_build_passes_args_pass(self): kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self):
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_build_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, build_dir, None)
self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, build_dir, None) def test_exec_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit'
@@ -404,14 +404,19 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig')
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
arch='um',
cross_compile=None) @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here.
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig')
mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit',
kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig',
arch='um')
if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main() -- 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog